The us Department of Justice has decided that all forms of online playing are not illegal according to the Cord Act of 1961. The new decision states that the Cord Act only focuses on sports bets and not casino or poker offerings. This new judi qq position brings the probability of individual states or a small grouping of states banding together to allow online playing in their states. It also opens up possibilities in the industry that have not been available in a long time.
First, the states have the possibility to bring in a lot of tax revenue and some job creation based on online playing. States that have playing or Indian Gaming within state should clearly be interested in pursuing intrastate online playing. They have a lot to gain and the possibility to balance their budgets. The question is how they should go about it.
Will they treat it like a state run lottery. Many states already have this is place. Some of the facets of the lottery can affect online playing, but not much. The states must obtain the software, secure it, promote it and run it. Next to your skin to manage the payout and number generators. Not to mention, stop cheaters and provide funding for both deposits and withdrawals. The purpose to this is that states will be pushed to begin and run an operation like this. So many states must look at creative options.
One of the options is Indian Gaming. They have many playing establishments and probably are better fitted to move around in the online direction. They do have many of the same difficulties as the states and more challenges in the funding sectors. Truth be told online playing could very much diminish their playing profits from their offline casinos. Something they have a monopoly on for the most part. For this reason it’s possible they may fight online playing rather than participate in it.
The next logical option is the current playing establishments. In Nevada, many formerly tried for the necessary licenses for online playing. They appear to moving in the direction of providing online gaming to Nevada. Precisely how far are they is uncertain, but they have the resources, the will, and motivation to make it work. They too are in risk of losing revenues to online playing. They are far more likely to participate than to fight it. They have proven they want to participate and are relocating the direction already.
The last option is current online playing establishments. They already have the software, are currently operating, and have the funding options already in place. This positions them in the driver’s seat and provide them a potential inside track. Like the others mentioned above, they have some issues to overcome. First they are not located in the usa at all. This positions a lot of problems since this is a states only effort and they don’t want to violate the Cord Act in any way. So these companies must set up shop in the state and operate a version of their software just for nys. Something they could pretty easily do.
The lording it over obviously opens up a lot of interesting possibilities, but which option is right will be determined at a later time if. The term US poker sites and US casino sites may be a thing of the past and replaced with state poker sites and state casino sites. Would it not be odd to Google search for Nevada on line poker sites or New york online casinos.